Skip to main content
utility-drawer__close
0
Add funds
Fund 1
Fund 2
Fund 3
Fund 4
Confirm your location and role
location select
language select
Municipal Bonds

Municipal bonds: Are attractive valuations creating an entry point?

Daniel J. Close
Head of Municipals
Municipal bond commentary

Key takeaways

The municipal bond market experienced negative third quarter returns in sympathy with U.S. Treasuries. With the U.S. Federal Reserve nearing the end of its rate hike cycle, higher yields have increased future expected returns, given yields are now at levels not seen over the last decade. We believe portfolios should be rewarded by assuming a modestly longer duration profile while adding credit risk.

The Fed’s dot plot of rate expectations shows a higher-for-longer period.

Defeating inflation continues as a slow grind

As the U.S. Federal Reserve appears near the end of its rate hike cycle, Treasury yield volatility has surged as market dynamics shifted.

The Fed raised the fed funds rate by 25 basis points (bps) at its July meeting and held rates steady in September. The Fed’s dot plot of rate expectations shows a higher-for-longer period as the central bank commits to bring inflation down to its 2% target. Chair Jerome Powell also stated that a soft landing was likely.

The market interpreted this combination to mean a long, slow grind to defeating inflation. Treasury yields increased rapidly, and the yield curve steepened during the final days of the quarter. The 10-year Treasury yield rose 73 bps during the quarter, while the 30-year yield rose 84 bps.

Additionally, U.S. Treasury market technicals weakened substantially. Issuance increased dramatically following the resolution of the U.S. debt ceiling debate in June. At the same time, demand declined from non-U.S. buyers due to the strength of the U.S. dollar.

Volatile U.S. Treasuries apply pressure

The surge in Treasury yields did not allow municipal bond cash flows time to provide the performance cushion typically experienced during periods of interest rate volatility. The Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index returned -3.95%, the worst quarterly performance since the first quarter of 2022, and yields rose 80 bps from 3.52% to 4.32% over the quarter.

The Bloomberg High Yield Municipal Bond Index returned -4.24% after index yields increased from 5.72% to 6.25%. Even the 35 bps of spread tightening could not meaningfully offset high yield munis’ longer average duration and the rapid increase in Treasury yields.

The Fed gains credibility in fighting inflation

The Fed’s higher-for-longer stance is feeding a sustained environment of elevated yields. We think this provides the most attractive entry point for municipal investors in more than a decade.

Long-term investors are now able to lock in higher yields from municipal bonds. But short-term price fluctuations are keeping investors with cash on the sidelines, since it is impossible to predict the peak in interest rates.

Market strategists generally expected a soft landing, given the resiliency of the economy and continued strength in the labor market. These tailwinds have supported credit sensitive markets, but we believe investors should remain cautious.

The lagging effects of rate hikes may take longer to appear in this cycle. Consumer cash balances were higher going into Fed tightening, many corporations locked in longer-dated financing at low interest rates, residential mortgages were re-financed broadly at low interest rates, and fiscal expansion was greater ahead of this tightening cycle.

These factors continue to aid economic expansion. But if the economy shows signs of weakness due to lagged impacts, the interest rate environment could abruptly shift to a declining trend.

Muni bond valuations are increasingly favorable

Municipal bond yields increased in sympathy with Treasury yields. The 10-year AAA muni yield rose 89 bps, ending the quarter at 3.45%. The 30- year yield increased 85 bps, finishing at 4.34%. Municipal-to-Treasury ratios increased, with the 10-year ratio moving from 67% to 75% and 30- year ratio increasing from 90% to 92%. Longer maturities continue to offer compelling value, and the muni-to-Treasury yield ratio curve signals steepness in the municipal yield curve not seen in the Treasury curve.

Investment grade municipal credit spreads narrowed slightly during the quarter. AA rated spreads tightened by 3 to 6 bps across the yield curve, and A rated spreads narrowed by 2 bps. High yield municipal credit spreads tightened more meaningfully, narrowing 35 bps during the quarter.

Spread tightening across the credit spectrum generally points to healthy municipal market dynamics. New issue supply remains low, and robust summer reinvestment from coupons, calls and maturities supported municipals.

Generally, it is critical that fixed income returns are greater than the rate of inflation, as this represents investors’ real rate of return. From 2020 to early 2022, inflation outpaced most high-quality fixed income bond yields, creating negative real rates. Today, municipal yields have adjusted higher while inflation is declining, boding well for real returns moving forward.

The essential service nature of the municipal market has historically afforded resiliency in the face of economic uncertainty. Enthusiasm around higher yields continues to build, especially as they offer more cushion against Treasury volatility.

Further, U.S. taxpayers potentially face higher future tax rates that could be enacted to counteract federal budget deficits and related interest costs, making the tax-exempt status of municipals more attractive.

The technical environment remains supportive

Supply

Issuance declined 13% this year versus the first three quarters of 2022. A combination of record tax receipts and large federal aid programs left municipalities flush with cash.

New money issuance is down 15%, to $274.7 billion year-to-date, due to higher borrowing costs and rate volatility. And the municipal market saw historically large amounts of reinvestment during the summer months from outsized bonds maturing and coupon payments, resulting in net negative supply.

Refunding issuance was down 15% year-over-year through the end of the quarter. Net present value savings from refunding deals have decreased meaningfully with borrowing costs elevated due to Fed policy.

Fourth quarter issuance trends are typically robust, but issuers may seek better timing to place deals with yields at their cycle peak. Nevertheless, we expect issuance to increase off the summer lows but remain muted.

Demand

After record outflows in 2022, net outflows from open-end funds total -$2.5 billion in 2023 year-to-date. Third quarter outflows totaled -$7.3 billion, as surging Treasury yields created more redemptions from open-end mutual funds.

Demand for individual bonds remains a bright spot. Higher yields have fueled strong demand from separately managed account programs and direct purchases, causing short-term ratios to decline.

Looking forward, we anticipate net inflows to return once Treasury yields stabilize, as concern over inflation and Fed policy begins to dissipate and investors see municipal bonds as a source for income.

Defaults

First-time municipal bond defaults totaled $1.5 billion in par value year-to-date, trending with historical averages. While defaults increased, first-time distress levels remain muted. Defaults have been concentrated in three sectors, with 62% coming from senior living, project finance and non-profits.

While economic uncertainty exists, widespread issues are not expected in 2023 and 2024, as record balance sheets should provide ample protection for most issuers. We expect municipal bond defaults should remain low, rare and idiosyncratic, reflecting the resiliency of the asset class even in economic downturns.

Credit spreads

High yield municipal credit spreads narrowed during the third quarter from 245 bps to 210 bps over the equivalent-maturity AAA bond. Nevertheless, the Bloomberg High Yield Municipal Bond Index returned -4.24% for the quarter and remains flat year-to-date, as its long duration hurt performance in a volatile rate environment. Lower investment grade spreads were stable, with BBB spreads remaining at 99 bps.

High yield municipal spreads remain near their historical averages. High yield munis remain attractive, considering their fundamental strength and taxable-equivalent yields. In addition, the outflow cycle of 2022 has not yet reversed. Investors have waited for a catalyst to move back into long-term fixed income.

As the Fed nears the end of its rate hike cycle and interest rates stabilize, investors may look to balance their elevated cash positions with capturing higher long-term yields. Positive momentum in fund flows may push spreads tighter and support total returns going forward.

Credit remains strong overall

Credit remains strong overall, with historic levels of rainy day funds and unspent transfers from Covid relief bills. And while revenue growth has declined from 2021 and 2022 highs, collections generally remain solid, outside of California.

Maui wildfires destroy a highly developed area

Multiple wildfires broke out on the Island of Maui in early August that devastated the communities of Lahaina, Kula and Olinda. The wildfires burned a relatively small yet highly developed land area that was popular with residents and tourists. The property destruction will result in a future drop in the taxable assessed valuation (AV), which is used to calculate the property tax levy. Maui County relies heavily on property tax revenue for operations and for paying debt service on its general obligation bonds.

While tourism is important to the local economy, taxes derived from discretionary sources such as hotel stays account for a small percentage of the county’s operating revenue. Maui residents whose homes or businesses were destroyed by the wildfires are exempt from paying property taxes for fiscal year 2023-2024 and owners who have already paid will receive refunds. It is too early to know how significant the decline in property tax revenues will be, but the county has a strong financial position, with ample liquidity, that will help address these costs. In addition, the county’s tax base is large and better able to absorb the potential AV reduction. President Biden declared the wildfires a major disaster, which makes federal funding available to the local government and affected individuals.

Maui County relies heavily on property tax revenue for operations and for paying debt service on its general obligation bonds.

Much of the highly desirable Lahaina region is expected to be rebuilt. The new properties would be assessed at their market value upon completion, which would likely result in higher assessed values and an eventual increase in property tax revenue. Both Maui County and the state of Hawaii have been sued for gross negligence and wrongful conduct leading to the fires. The total legal costs and claims liabilities, if any, will not be known for years.

Hawaiian Electric faces substantial financial challenges

Hawaiian Electric Company (HECO) is under extreme scrutiny for potentially causing the Maui wildfires in August. While the cause is still being investigated and liabilities are still being determined, HECO looks like it could be at least partially responsible for damages. HECO conceded that their downed power line ignited the initial fire, but claims firefighters extinguished that blaze. They believe a secondary fire ignited after HECO had deenergized power lines, destroying much of Lahaina.

Estimated damages range from $5 billion to $7 billion, with the potential for assigned damages to outstrip the enterprise value of HECO. Additionally, several lawsuits have been filed against HECO, including from Maui County, increasing the overall costs for HECO if it is found to be responsible.

Cost recovery for HECO to fund potential damages or lawsuits could be extremely difficult, as utility rates are already high, the total number of ratepayers is relatively small and ratepayers’ income levels are generally below average. For the utility to continue to exist and provide power, HECO will likely require support beyond the $95 million pledge from the federal government for rebuilding efforts. Although HECO has indicated its goal is not to restructure, the utility is facing the possibility of substantial financial liabilities and likely constrained capital markets access, making bankruptcy a continued risk.

Governments maintain extraordinary financial flexibility

Following years of double-digit growth in revenue collections, many municipalities are preparing for budgetary deficits as federal pandemic funds expire and investment returns decline.

Through second quarter 2023, state tax revenue collections are down -10.7% at $398 billion compared to the first half of 2022. However, quarterly collections are still more than the historical average of $296 billion. State pension returns weakened in 2022, with average funded ratios declining to 77.3% from 83.9% in 2021. Investment returns are expected to be 5.3% in 2023, less than the assumed rate of return of 6.8%.

Governments maintain extraordinary financial flexibility, and fundamentals remain strong. They are prepared to balance budget deficits by reducing targeted expenditures. Average state spending increased by an elevated 16.8% in 2022, due mostly to one-time Covid-related spending. States are estimating just a 2.5% increase in expenditures in FY24. Governments also have the flexibility to reduce other expenditures and increase revenues.

In addition, municipal governments’ rainy day funds, or savings/reserves, sit at historical highs. State governments are entering FY24 with $159 billion in rainy day funds, totaling more than double pre-pandemic levels, which offers significant budgetary flexibility.

As municipal credit quality remains strong, Moody’s upgrades are outpacing downgrades by a 4:1 ratio. Upgrades are outpacing downgrades for the tenth consecutive quarter through second quarter 2023.

It is taking longer than expected for hospitals to recover from pandemic-related changes to volumes, revenues and cost structures.
Hospitals slowly recover from the pandemic

Hospitals and health systems continue their slow recovery from the pandemic and particularly the post-pandemic environment. While the onset of the pandemic made 2020 a difficult year for hospitals, volumes and revenue had largely returned by late 2021. Margins had recovered, and financials were looking much stronger.

However, 2022 turned out to be one of the worst for hospitals in recent memory as the combined impact of unexpected industry-wide cost spikes and the expiration of most pandemic aid programs took their toll on margins.

The cost surges were driven mostly by staffing shortages that forced hospitals to rely heavily on extremely expensive contract labor, particularly agency nurses. This significantly increased staffing costs in the short-run and resulted in smaller increases in ongoing staffing costs, as the normal wage rates for in-house nurses increased as well. This was exacerbated by the expiration of the federal funding hospitals received during the pandemic to offset pandemic-related losses.

Operating stresses also accelerated hospital mergers and acquisition activity, as hospitals and health systems sought to address these challenges through greater efficiencies and increased contracting leverage.

Overall, it is clearly taking longer than expected for hospitals to recover from pandemic-related changes to volumes, revenues and cost structures. However, many providers are finally showing material improvement. As usual, some hospitals and health systems are better positioned to adapt to the changing environment than others, and not all will recover at the same pace. And some may never fully recover.

Outlook

Clip the coupon through near-term uncertainty

We see a few main factors driving fourth quarter municipal bond performance. Most important is the surge in U.S. Treasury yields that has not been supported by fundamentals. Ultimately, we think softening inflation should lead to a more range-bound interest rate environment, and technical shocks may offer attractive entry points for investors willing to absorb near-term volatility.

Second, municipal market technical factors continue to be buoyed by strong reinvestment demand and slower issuance.

Further, muni credit fundamentals remain strong. Plentiful reserves mean municipalities are generally well positioned to weather an economic slowdown driven by higher interest rates. Despite this, credit selection continues to grow in importance as tighter economic conditions pressure specific names.

Finally, the Fed has affirmed its commitment to defeating inflation. 30-year Treasury real yields are the highest in the last decade, and a positively sloped municipal yield curve and strong fundamentals provide an opportunity to drive income. After a painful 2022 and challenges in 2023, income investors assuming the Fed would have paused already in 2023 have not experienced the price returns they expected. But higher yields have increased future expected returns.

Going forward, income investors do not require declining yields to have a positive experience. With Treasury market stabilization, municipal bond investors can enjoy more than 4% tax-advantaged annualized returns through income alone for high quality, essential service investments. In the high yield municipal space, tax-exempt yields are in excess of 6%.

2023 Themes

Economic environment
  • Inflation has come down sharply in recent months, and the trajectory is favorable due to goods and the rollover of housing costs.
  • Core services inflation excluding housing remains sticky and elevated.
  • The fed funds rate has risen by 525 bps during this cycle. Federal Reserve policy remains data dependent, with a focus on core services inflation.
  • Another rate hike is possible before year end; we do not expect rate cuts until the second half of 2024.
  • U.S. growth should trend lower as the impact of Fed policy is fully absorbed. Key factors include interest rates, continued headwinds in the banking sector and declining money supply.
  • While the economic slowdown may be milder than expected, we remain unconvinced the Fed can engineer a soft landing.
  • Uncertainty regarding the end of Fed rate tightening continues to cause elevated rates. Anticipate a return to range-bound trading once the Fed is done with rate hike campaign.
Municipal market environment
  • Credit remains strong, with historic levels of rainy day funds.
  • While revenue collections are solid and above 2021 levels, they have slipped below the peaks witnessed in 2022.
  • We expect municipal defaults will remain low, rare and idiosyncratic.
  • Supply should return in the fourth quarter but remains depressed compared to the prior year.
  • Demand through the third quarter has focused on intermediate, long duration and high yield.
  • Absolute yields are now at levels last seen in 2007, which might spur investor demand heading into 2024, particularly when investors have conviction the Fed is done hiking.
  • Municipal performance is expected to rebound as interest rates stabilize and inflows return.
  • Absent a meaningful catalyst, municipals can still post attractive returns based on elevated income generation from adjusted rates.
  • Long-term tax-exempt and taxable municipal valuations are attractive on a spread basis, compared to similar maturity U.S. Treasuries and corporate bonds.
Related articles
Weekly Fixed Income Commentary Treasury yields rise, awaiting inflation data and the Fed
U.S. Treasury yields rose after the prior week’s rally, amid strong labor market data.
Municipal Bonds Municipal market: How rates rise matters
At its May meeting, the U.S. Federal Reserve increased rates another 25 basis points. Many investors feel we are at or near the peak rate for this tightening cycle.
Municipal Bonds
In episode 13 of MuniTV, Dan Close, Head of Municipals, talks about interest rates, market conditions and what this means for investors' portfolios.

Endnotes

Sources
Gross Domestic Product: U.S. Department of Commerce. Treasury Yields and Ratios: Bloomberg (subscription required). Municipal Bond Yields: Municipal Market Data. Open-end fund flows: Investment Company Institute. Municipal Issuance: Seibert Research. Defaults: Municipals Weekly, Bank of America/Merrill Lynch Research. State Revenues: The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, State Revenue Report. State Budget Reserves: Pew Charitable Trust. Global Growth: International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Standard & Poor’s and Investortools: http://www.invtools.com/. Flow of Funds, The Federal Reserve Board: http://www. federalreserve.gov/releases.pdf. Payroll Data: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Bond Ratings: Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, Fitch. New Money Project Financing: The Bond Buyer. State revenues: U.S. Census Bureau.

The views and opinions expressed are for informational and educational purposes only as of the date of production/writing and may change without notice at any time based on numerous factors, such as market or other conditions, legal and regulatory developments, additional risks and uncertainties and may not come to pass. This material may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections, forecasts, estimates of market returns, and proposed or expected portfolio composition. Any changes to assumptions that may have been made in preparing this material could have a material impact on the information presented herein by way of example. Performance data shown represents past performance and does not predict or guarantee future results. Investing involves risk; principal loss is possible.

All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such. For term definitions and index descriptions, please access the glossary on nuveen.com. Please note, it is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Important information on risk
Investing involves risk; principal loss is possible. All investments carry a certain degree of risk and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. Investing in municipal bonds involves risks such as interest rate risk, credit risk and market risk. The value of the portfolio will fluctuate based on the value of the underlying securities. There are special risks associated with investments in high yield bonds, hedging activities and the potential use of leverage. Portfolios that include lower rated municipal bonds, commonly referred to as “high yield” or “junk” bonds, which are considered to be speculative, the credit and investment risk is heightened for the portfolio. Bond insurance guarantees only the payment of principal and interest on the bond when due, and not the value of the bonds themselves, which will fluctuate with the bond market and the financial success of the issuer and the insurer. No representation is made as to an insurer’s ability to meet their commitments. This information should not replace an investor’s consultation with a financial professional regarding their tax situation. Nuveen is not a tax advisor. Investors should contact a tax professional regarding the appropriateness of tax-exempt investments in their portfolio. If sold prior to maturity, municipal securities are subject to gain/losses based on the level of interest rates, market conditions and the credit quality of the issuer. Income may be subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT) and/or state and local taxes, based on the state of residence. Income from municipal bonds held by a portfolio could be declared taxable because of unfavorable changes in tax laws, adverse interpretations by the Internal Revenue Service or state tax authorities, or noncompliant conduct of a bond issuer. It is important to review your investment objectives, risk tolerance and liquidity needs before choosing an investment style or manager.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
Nuveen, LLC provides investment solutions through its investment specialists.
This information does not constitute investment research as defined under MiFID.

Aerial view of the ocean shore

You are on the site for: Financial Professionals and Individual Investors. You can switch to the site for: Institutional Investors or Global Investors

You are about to access our website for visitors outside of the United States.

You are about to access our website for Nuveen Global Cities REIT

You are leaving the Nuveen website.

You are leaving the Nuveen website and going to the website of the MI 529 Advisor Plan, distributed by Nuveen Securities, LLC.

The Nuveen website for institutional investors is available for you.

You are about to access our website for visitors outside of the United States.

You are about to access our website for Nuveen Churchill Private Capital Income Fund (“NC - PCAP”)

Contact us
Contact us
Back to Top