Is high yield high risk?

Past headlines are constantly about the financial stress on municipalities — combined with high profile downgrades, defaults and even bankruptcies — have led many to believe that high yield issuers must be in financial distress. That is generally not the case. High yield municipal bonds typically fund essential services entirely separate from governmental operations that are financed by general obligation bonds (GOs). This misunderstanding provides opportunities for investors with strong fundamental research, long investment horizons and a willingness to accept the potential volatility of this asset class.

High yield municipal bonds are primarily project bonds

High yield municipal bonds are not GOs, for the most part. They are primarily project bonds that provide an element of essential service that is financially independent from the city, county or state they serve. These revenue bonds tend to offer higher yields to compensate investors for the risk and uncertainty associated with the project’s revenue stream.

That means that the high yield municipal bond market is generally not concerned with issues typically associated with GOs — balancing budgets, funding pensions or managing long-term health care costs. Rather, high yield investors pay close attention to the project’s economics and competitive position, as well as security features such as:

• A revenue pledge, which provides a security interest in the revenues generated by the project.

• A limited tax revenue pledge, where only those tax revenues pledged to debt service support the bonds.

• An incremental tax pledge, where only the new tax revenues generated by the project support debt service.

• A first mortgage lien on property or other assets.

• Other forms of security interests in the real estate or project.

These features, along with higher yields, help compensate investors for the added risk.

In contrast, the “full faith and credit” pledge behind GOs can still become an unsecured promise to pay in the event of a default or bankruptcy. Since high yield municipal bonds often have security features such as liens on land, tax liens on the project and/or security interest in the revenue stream, more potential remedies exist in the event of distress or default. These remedies potentially provide more protection than those found in similarly rated corporate high yield bonds, which are often subordinated in the capital structure of a high yield issuer.

Lastly, high yield municipal bonds often relate to an element of essential service that provides a strong level of credit support.

High yield municipals cross many sectors

High yield municipal credit sectors can be characterized in numerous ways. Some credit factors cut across sectors, such as whether a security is secured by land (protected by a first mortgage on the land) or an annual appropriation pledge (a taxing entity’s promise to appropriate funds). However, the major credit sectors can be broken into various profiles:

Taxed backed. A tax associated with land or infrastructure development generates revenues for repayment. Subtypes include special assessment districts, community development districts, redevelopment districts, infrastructure development and public improvement districts. Some projects in this sector are referred to as “mud” districts or “dirt” deals, indicating various stages of above-ground development. Many of these projects also include a lien on the above-ground project. These credits can range from very risky projects with limited initial development to fully developed projects with diversified sources of tax payments from an array of landowners and residents who have subsequently moved into the district.

Health care. These projects range from hospitals or hospital systems to nursing homes and congregate care facilities. These credits are typically rated anywhere from AA+ to B- and below. Although size is not the determinate factor, some larger, diversified health care projects fall into the mid-investment grade space, while smaller, less financially flexible stand-alone facilities tend to be higher yielding credits. Health care is being impacted by many factors, including an aging population, the Affordable Care Act and changes in business and delivery models. As a result, these bonds require intense credit analysis and consequently may offer higher yields. Many health care credits can be evaluated like corporate credits, with balance sheets, income statements, real estate and other assets.

Education and charter schools. Similar to health care, credits in the education sector span the ratings spectrum from AAA-rated Harvard University to high yield credits such as small, private colleges or charter schools. Evaluating these credits requires knowledge of enrollment trends and intense focus on operating and balance sheet metrics (debt service coverage, operating leverage and liquidity cushion). Bondholder security is another key part of the analysis, with attention to legal protections, such as a mortgage or revenue pledge, and financial covenants.

Transportation and tollroads. These revenue bonds are repaid by tolls or facility rental fees from a public transportation system (e.g., toll roads, airport gates). Debt service repayment ability depends on facility usage and project management.

Tobacco. Tobacco settlement bonds are repaid by revenues from the Master Settlement Agreement between various states and participating tobacco manufacturers. The payments by the tobacco companies to the states are determined by a multi-variable formula heavily based on cigarette consumption. Therefore, one risk is that domestic sales of cigarettes may decline further than declines assumed in the various bond documents. Some of these bonds carry investment grade ratings, but the market generally trades these as high yield bonds.

Industrial development and pollution control. Many of these projects depend on repayment from large industrial firms, with the bond proceeds meeting the public purpose to create jobs and/or reduce pollution. This sector is very similar in credit profile to the taxable high yield space, and sometimes a company will have bonds issued in both marketplaces.

Other sectors. High yield municipal bonds can also include financings for convention centers, Native American Tribal gaming facilities, utilities (including water and sewer facilities), multifamily housing and other smaller credit sectors.

Liquidity remains a risk

Liquidity is a risk in the high yield municipal marketplace. Headline risk can affect liquidity and may be triggered by events that have nothing to do with actual credit factors. For example, high yield municipal prices fell dramatically in 2008 even though the vast majority of high yield municipal bonds continued to pay interest and principal when due. In late 2010, an analyst forecasted a rapid increase in municipal bond defaults within cities and counties causing a selloff in high yield municipals. In reality, defaults had actually begun declining from their post-crisis peak. Because these credit issues can be misunderstood and the bonds are often thinly traded, headlines and other factors can impact liquidity – an inherent risk in the high yield municipal bond market.

Portfolios were eventually compensated for patience

In times of elevated market volatility or negative press, investors may decide to sell and wait for conditions or valuations to improve before reallocating funds. But most cannot time the market perfectly, which can mean lost opportunity.

There are five recent periods where municipal yields increased by at least 100 basis points in less than one year. We examined the total return of hypothetical $100,000 portfolios held for 3-, 6- and 12-month periods following each spike. In holding periods of 12 months or longer, staying the course benefited investors.

Misunderstanding may create value

Municipal credit has continued to prove resilient during periods of market disruptions, with the most recent example being the coronavirus pandemic. Municipalities have not only recovered from this crisis, but metrics are even stronger.

The media focus on high profile credit situations leaves many investors concerned about the overall state of municipal GO credit quality. However, these GO credits are typically not core to the high yield municipal market, and consequently those important concerns are less relevant to high yield municipals.

This misunderstanding may create pricing opportunities. The current ratio of high yield municipal yields to high yield corporate yields is 79%, in line with the historical average.

Furthermore, high yield municipals have a low historical correlation to other asset classes, making them an appropriate complement to an overall portfolio. The correlation to equities, Treasuries and corporate high yield is generally near or below 50%.

Fundamental research identifies opportunities

Evaluating high yield municipal bonds typically requires understanding issues relating to land or infrastructure development, potential impact on balance sheets and income statements and issues specific to healthcare policy and education. We believe that in-depth fundamental research can help an investor understand risks, identify opportunities and capitalize on the inefficiencies in this misunderstood asset class.