- Americas
- Asia Pacific
- Europe, Middle East, Africa
- Canada
- Latin America
- United States
- Australia
- Hong Kong
- Japan
- Mainland China
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
- Singapore
- South Korea
- Taiwan
- Thailand
- Other
- Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM)
- Austria
- Belgium
- Denmark
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Ireland
- Italy
- Luxembourg
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- United Kingdom
- Other
- Institutional Investor
- Individual Investor
- Financial Professional
- Global Cities REIT (GCREIT)
- Green Capital
- Private Capital Income Fund (PCAP)
A notable shift in the 2026 landscape will be the narrowing gap between developed markets (DM) and emerging markets (EM) in terms of macro stability, institutional credibility and policy predictability (Figure 6). Questions investors once reserved for emerging markets around political continuity, central bank independence and the durability of fiscal and institutional anchors are becoming increasingly relevant across major developed economies.
Sign up for fixed income insights from Nuveen.
Political transitions in France and Japan, alongside the change in U.S. Federal Reserve leadership when Chair Powell’s term ends in early 2026, introduce uncertainty as global term premiums have already risen. Meanwhile, continued supply chain adjustments, elevated geopolitical tensions and an increasingly fragmented trade environment mean that DM economies face structural forces traditionally associated with EM.
At the same time, many EM economies have strengthened their fundamentals. Proactive and more decisive monetary tightening, healthier balance sheets and more credible policy frameworks mean EM assets are entering 2026 from a position of relative stability.
For investors, these factors make the case for taking a more EM-style analytical framework to DM issuers: assessing political and institutional risks as part of the overall credit, rates and currency outlooks. It also supports selective allocations to areas insulated from sovereign-level volatility such as securitized credit and municipals, while recognizing that high-quality EM debt may offer diversification benefits traditionally associated with DM.
Actions to consider
- Analyze political and institutional risks in both DM and EM allocations.
- Favor sovereign-insulated assets like securitized credit and municipals.
Continue reading
About the author
Contact us
- Chicago
- Boston
- Charlotte
- Dallas
- Los Angeles
- Miami
- New York
- San Francisco
- Washington DC
- +1 312 917 7700
- 333 W Wacker Drive, Chicago, United States of America
- +1 617 385 7320
- 100 Federal Street, Boston, United States of America
- +1 704 988 1000
- 8500 Andrew Carnegie Boulevard, Charlotte, United States of America
- 1 972 972 7603
- 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1650 Dallas, TX 75201, United States of America
- +1 305 929 7100
- 501 Brickell Key Drive, Suite 504, Miami, United States of America
- +1 212 490 9000
- 730 Third Avenue, New York, United States of America
- +1 800 842 2007
- 560 Mission Street, San Francisco, United States of America
- +1 202 378 1840
- 601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington DC, United States of America