This site has been created for exclusive use by institutional investors only and does not take into account investment objectives, financial situation or specific needs of any individual investor. Information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.
If you are not an institutional client, consultant or financial professional and are looking for more information about mutual funds and other products at Nuveen, please visit our site at www.nuveen.com.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. All investments involve some degree of risk including loss of principal. Investment objectives may not be met.
By agreeing you are confirming you are being truthful, acknowledging you have read the information above and accept the terms and conditions set out with this site and meeting the intended audience requirement for this site. Not all content on this site is appropriate or applicable for the general public and we cannot guarantee consequences with the use of this information by unauthorized or unintended users. Content on this site may not be redistributed and is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or provide a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.
Why farmland now?
and consistent investment with
upside growth potential
- Increased market volatility has forced investors to search for assets that will be resilient throughout the economic cycle. Unexpected market events are seemingly becoming more common, requiring investors to revisit their asset class allocation strategies in order to meet their long-term return targets at an acceptable level of volatility.
- Farmland is gaining more mainstream acceptance as an institutional asset class, historically providing attractive long-term annualized returns that are uncorrelated to traditional financial products such as fixed income and global equities, and low correlation to other real assets. Farmland returns are historically extremely resilient and consistent throughout the economic cycle.
Why farmland now?
Farmland continues to provide strong and consistent risk-weighted returns relative to other asset classes. Farmland’s performance is unique relative to other financial products due to its relatively low volatility, negative correlation with equities, and consistent performance throughout economic cycles. Farmland has a history of preserving capital in times of economic downturns, and is currently delivering annual income returns above government bond yields in developed countries.
The current low interest rate environment is a function of poor economic growth and a low inflationary environment. Government bond yields in all major developed economies have declined in recent decades. Due to the reduction in bond yields, investors have increasingly begun to seek returns elsewhere. This fact, coupled with the low cost of borrowing, which is also a product of a low interest rate environment, has significantly increased investor demand for real assets (real estate, infrastructure and farmland). The increased demand for these assets has resulted in strong value appreciation in recent years, which in certain cases has outpaced the asset’s earnings potential and has resulted in yield compression. However, despite this compression, farmland yields remain attractive relative to other financial products.
When evaluating an investment, it is important to consider the return volatility in addition to expected return. Chart 2 compares the volatility of U.S. farmland returns to the S&P 500 and U.S. 10-year bonds over an 18-year period from 2000 – 2018. During the period, U.S. farmland returns have experienced a similar level volatility as U.S. 10-year bonds and, significantly lower volatility than equities. Despite its comparable return volatility, farmland has consistently outperformed 10-year bonds, delivering significantly higher yields.
As a result of its superior risk weighted return, one can view farmland as a powerful diversifier within an investment portfolio.
Farmland’s low volatility becomes particularly valuable in periods of financial uncertainty. In periods of economic adjustment, the asset, unlike other financial products, has proven to be extremely resilient, outperforming all other assets classes.
Chart 3 demonstrates the resilience of farmland returns over four decades despite periods when the U.S. and/or global economy was in recession.
The 2008 financial crisis caused severe and prolonged recessions in many of the world’s leading economies. In the U.S., the negative consequences of the financial crisis were experienced across most sectors of the economy. However, this period was relatively profitable for the agricultural sector, resulting in strong farm-gate profitability and higher agricultural land values. Kuethe et al. demonstrated that in the four-year period leading up to the 2008 financial crisis and the four-year period after the crisis, farmland consistently produced positive returns, outperforming U.S. treasuries, the Dow Jones, and the S&P 500 over the 8-year period.1
Farmland’s asymmetric return profile presents a compelling case to invest during instances of economic uncertainty. U.S. farmland has delivered only one quarter of negative returns since 1999 (-0.01% in the first quarter of 2002). Importantly, during periods in which the S&P 500 declined, farmland delivered positive returns. The durability and negative correlation of farmland returns to economic cycles is driven by the consistent requirement of a growing population to eat from a limited land resource base.
Agriculture has experienced a continuous wave of new technologies being introduced over many decades, resulting in productivity improvements. These improvements typically result in improved yields and/or a lower cost of production, positively influencing farmer profitability and underlying land values. Global agricultural total factor productivity (TFP), which measures the changes in the efficiency by which inputs are transformed into outputs, doubled in the 1990s to just over 1.5% per annum relative to what was achieved in the 1970s and 1980s. Importantly, TFP has remained at this higher pace since the 1990s through to today, supported by technology adoption. Chart 4 shows examples of technology introductions and their adoption rates. Tractors were first introduced in the U.S. in 1910 and took almost 50 years to replace horses in agriculture, reducing labour and increased efficiency of planting. In 1996, the introduction of herbicide-tolerant corn in the U.S. took less than 20 years to be adopted. The acceleration of technology adoption is a trend witnessed across many industries and will support productivity growth in agriculture.
Examples of new technologies being introduced include drones and satellite imagery, improved genetics and increased data collection and analysis. These new technological and genetic advances will help reduce the environmental impact of modern agriculture making it more sustainable, helping to produce more with less.
Fundamental farmland return characteristics remain intact, with upside potential on the horizon in the form of productivity advancements. Farmland possesses a number of unique characteristics, including: a history of strong yields, low volatility, negative correlation to equities, and a resilience to economic cycles. These factors create a compelling case for the inclusion of the asset class in a diversified investment portfolio.
1 Kuethe T.H. et al. (2013): Farmland versus Alternative Investments before and after the 2008 Financial Crisis. Journal of the ASFMRA p.120-131
Recommend further reading: Elworthy, F. (2018): Volatility to Explain High Historical Farmland Returns. The Property Chronicle. May 9th
Ibbotson, R.G.; Kaplan P.D. (2000): Does Asset Allocation Policy explain, 40, 90 or 100 percent of Performance. Association for Investment Management and Research.
Jan/Feb 2000. p.26-33
Key, N. (2018): Productivity Increases with Farm Size in the Heartland Region. USDA-ERS
Painter, M.J. (2015): Assessing the Required Risk Premium for North American Farmland Investment. Journal of ASFMRA, p.15-33
Sands, R. et al. (2014): Global Drivers of Agricultural Demand and Supply. USDA ERS
Sorensen, A.A.J. et al. (2018): Farms under Threat: The State of America’s Farmland. Washington D.C. American Farmland Trust
Wang S., et al. (2015): Agricultural Productivity Growth in the United States: Measurement, Trends, and Drivers, ERR-189, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic
Research Service, July 2015.
This material is provided for informational or educational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation of any securities in any jurisdiction in which such solicitation is unlawful or to any person to whom it is unlawful. Moreover, it neither constitutes an offer to enter into an investment agreement with the recipient of this document nor an invitation to respond to it by making an offer to enter into an investment agreement.
This material may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include projections, forecasts, estimates of yields or returns, and proposed or expected portfolio composition. Moreover, certain historical performance information of other investment vehicles or composite accounts managed by Nuveen may be included in this material and such performance information is presented by way of example only. No representation is made that the performance presented will be achieved, or that every assumption made in achieving, calculating or presenting either the forward-looking information or the historical performance information herein has been considered or stated in preparing this material. Any changes to assumptions that may have been made in preparing this material could have a material impact on the investment returns that are presented herein by way of example.
This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources deemed by Nuveen to be reliable, and not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Company name is only for explanatory purposes and does not constitute as investment advice and is subject to change. Any investments named within this material may not necessarily be held in any funds/accounts managed by Nuveen. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Views of the author may not necessarily reflect the view s of Nuveen as a whole or any part thereof.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Investment involves risk, including loss of principal. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. Changes in the rates of exchange between currencies may cause the value of investments to fluctuate.
This information does not constitute investment research as defined under MiFID.
A word on risk
As an asset class, agricultural investments are less developed, more illiquid, and less transparent compared to traditional asset classes. Agricultural
investments will be subject to risks generally associated with the ownership of real estate-related assets, including changes in economic conditions,
environmental risks, the cost of and ability to obtain insurance, and risks related to leasing of properties.
Nuveen provides investment advisory solutions through its investment specialists.