This site has been created for exclusive use by institutional investors only and does not take into account investment objectives, financial situation or specific needs of any individual investor. Information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.
If you are not an institutional client, consultant or financial professional and are looking for more information about mutual funds and other products at Nuveen, please visit our site at www.nuveen.com.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. All investments involve some degree of risk including loss of principal. Investment objectives may not be met.
By agreeing you are confirming you are being truthful, acknowledging you have read the information above and accept the terms and conditions set out with this site and meeting the intended audience requirement for this site. Not all content on this site is appropriate or applicable for the general public and we cannot guarantee consequences with the use of this information by unauthorized or unintended users. Content on this site may not be redistributed and is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or provide a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.
Fed cuts once…twice…three times, then maybe
The Federal Reserve reduced its target interest rate once again. It has done so three times since July, as signs continue to point to weakness in the global economy and persistent uncertainty on trade policy. Today’s rate cut was expected, but it’s still unclear what — or when — the Fed’s next move will be.
The Federal Reserve (Fed) followed up cuts in July and September with a 25 basis point (bps) reduction in October. The federal funds rate target range is now 1.50% − 1.75%. Futures markets had already incorporated this rate cut into pricing, with the implied probability rising above 95% in the past few days from just 66% immediately following the last meeting. There were two dissents from the decision, both from regional Fed presidents who would have preferred to keep rates unchanged.
The statement released after the meeting removed a key promise that the Fed would “act as appropriate to sustain the expansion.” This phrase had been seen in prior statements as a tacit promise that more cuts were coming. Its absence from the October statement indicates that the Fed may no longer believe further cuts are necessary.
In his press conference, Chair Powell reinforced this impression, saying that monetary policy is “in a good place” and that the current level of rates is “likely to remain appropriate” if conditions unfold as the Fed expects. This means a December cut is only likely if incoming data greatly disappoints.
What comes next?
The October cut was considered a fait accompli, given worsening U.S. manufacturing data and weaker job creation in recent months. But the path from here is far less certain. Coming into the meeting, markets were pricing in just a 31% chance of another rate cut at the December 11 meeting and a 56% chance of a cut by the end of first quarter 2020. Those odds fell to 20% and 46%, respectively, before the end of Powell’s remarks, which were perceived to indicate the Fed won’t cut rates further for now.
History may provide some perspective on the Fed’s apparent decision to stop after three cuts. We have only two recent examples of “mid-cycle adjustments,” periods in which the Fed has cut rates in the middle of an economic expansion: 1995 and 1998. In both years, the Fed cut three times before ultimately raising rates again after a pause. While today’s Fed will not necessarily be held hostage to the actions of prior ones should conditions worsen, the symmetry of the three-cut adjustment may be attractive if it makes the transition to a “pause” simpler to communicate.
Our base case coming into the meeting was that the October cut would be the Fed’s last, at least for a while. Barring a deterioration of economic data or an unexpected increase in tariffs, we maintain that view.
How do markets normally behave when easing cycles end?
We know from recent experience that financial markets often react with alarm to hawkish — or, more accurately, less dovish — turns in monetary policy. Investors may recall the “taper tantrum” in 2013, when stocks briefly swooned and rates surged as the Fed hinted it would end its long-standing asset purchase program. An end to this year’s short easing cycle may not be as monumental as the end of quantitative easing. Nevertheless, we are braced for higher equity and fixed income market volatility through the end of the year. Adding to this expectation is the prospect of further policy uncertainty. Another tranche of U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports is set to go into effect on December 15, and the U.K. will hold a pivotal general election on December 12. As if that weren’t enough, a disruptive U.S. government shutdown later this year cannot be ruled out.
The market’s reaction to the statement and Powell’s comments was fairly muted. The market-implied odds of a December rate cut, which were already below 50% coming into the meeting, fell further. Stock prices and long-term rates barely budged.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the Atlantic...
While Jay Powell tried to prepare markets for a transition from an easing cycle to a pause, the European Central Bank (ECB) underwent a leadership transition. Christine Lagarde, former head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), will take the reins from Mario Draghi at the end of this week. Draghi’s eight years at the ECB’s helm were marked by aggressive balance sheet expansion and an experiment — active to this day — with negative interest rate policy to combat stubbornly weak growth and inflation on the continent.
Despite clear divisions at the ECB about the efficacy of Draghi’s policies, Lagarde represents a continuity of dovish leadership. As French Finance Minister during the global financial crisis and managing director of the IMF, Lagarde was often an outspoken voice for proactive and energetic government policy to provide economic stimulus and preserve market confidence. Notably, she opposed the Fed’s decision to begin raising interest rates in 2015 during Janet Yellen’s tenure.
Markets currently do not expect the ECB to raise interest rates back to positive territory until the mid-2020s, and the current quantitative easing policy seems likely to continue at least until eurozone growth and inflation return to less anemic levels. This, in turn, will pressure the Fed to keep interest rates low lest it further widen the gap between U.S. and international interest rates. This has historically pushed the U.S. dollar higher and destabilized global financial markets, as it did as recently as late-2018.
Federal Reserve Statement, October 2019.
This material is provided for informational or educational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation of any securities in any jurisdiction in which such solicitation is unlawful or to any person to whom it is unlawful. Moreover, it neither constitutes an offer to enter into an investment agreement with the recipient of this document nor an invitation to respond to it by making an offer to enter into an investment agreement.
This material may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include projections, forecasts, estimates of yields or returns, and proposed or expected portfolio composition. Moreover, certain historical performance information of other investment vehicles or composite accounts managed by Nuveen may be included in this material and such performance information is presented by way of example only. No representation is made that the performance presented will be achieved, or that every assumption made in achieving, calculating or presenting either the forward-looking information or the historical performance information herein has been considered or stated in preparing this material. Any changes to assumptions that may have been made in preparing this material could have a material impact on the investment returns that are presented herein by way of example.
This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources deemed by Nuveen to be reliable, and not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Company name is only for explanatory purposes and does not constitute as investment advice and is subject to change. Any investments named within this material may not necessarily be held in any funds/accounts managed by Nuveen. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Views of the author may not necessarily reflect the view s of Nuveen as a whole or any part thereof.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Investment involves risk, including loss of principal. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. Changes in the rates of exchange between currencies may cause the value of investments to fluctuate.
This information does not constitute investment research as defined under MiFID.
A basis point is a common unit of measure for interest rates and other percentages in finance. One basis point is equal to 1/100th of 1%, or 0.01%.
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) holds eight regularly scheduled meetings per year to review economic and financial conditions, determine the appropriate stance of monetary policy and assess the risks to its long-run goals of price stability and sustainable economic growth.
A word on risk
This report is for informational and educational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as investment advice or recommendations, does not constitute a solicitation to buy or sell securities and should not be considered specific legal, investment or tax advice or analysis. The analysis contained herein is based on the data available at the time of publication and the opinions of Nuveen Research.
The report should not be regarded by the recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment. All investments carry a certain degree of risk, including possible loss of principal, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. It is important to review investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax liability and liquidity needs before choosing an investment style or manager.
The investment advisory services, strategies and expertise of TIAA Investments, a division of Nuveen, are provided by Teachers Advisors, LLC and TIAA-CREF Investment Management, LLC.
Nuveen provides investment advisory solutions through its investment specialists.