Which type of investor are you?
U.S. Institutional investor?
Investment outlook

Past peak growth, but a long way to go

Rays of curved light



Resilient markets may make it costly to sit on the sidelines.

Late-cycle markets in an early-to-mid-cycle economy

In our midyear outlook from June, we pointed out that global growth was peaking, and we asked what would come next. Well, now we know. As the reopening boom fades and global stimulus winds down, financial markets have entered a choppier environment in which investors who take a lot of risk are no longer assured a big reward.

Let’s start with the good news: The global economic cycle is still young with – we think – years of solid growth ahead. Unemployment rates are falling rapidly as workers return to jobs, and global inventories are being frantically restocked as producers catch up to the surprising demand surge during the first half of the year. Residential and commercial real estate construction is cycling back up after a wobbly spring. Financial conditions are still quite loose thanks to easy monetary policy. And, most importantly, consumers have emerged from the pandemic with high levels of savings and unusually strong balance sheets (Figure 1). 

Figure 1 — U.S. household net worth has shot up on savings and stimulus

Now for the less good news: Prices across most financial markets have snapped back to their pre-pandemic valuations. Some assets like global equities and credit are actually even more expensive than before the pandemic (Figure 2). And the peak for global growth, including in the world’s largest economies, is now firmly in the rearview mirror, providing less of a macroeconomic tailwind. Our most important question for the balance of this year is: How do markets process slowing demand growth in the context of fully valued asset prices?

Figure 2 — Financial markets have returned to “late cycle” valuations quite quickly

Turning from inflation risks to growth risks

The Delta variant of COVID-19 has exacerbated the slowdowns already underway in the U.S. and Europe. More pressingly, it has delayed reopenings in areas like Asia and Latin America where vaccinations have only recently ramped up. But Delta is not the primary factor driving down growth rates. Government stimulus played a huge role in sustaining household incomes and spending throughout 2020 and into 2021. In the U.S., for example, individual tax credits enacted as part of the CARES Act were responsible for a nearly 7% net swing in income growth last year.

Moving forward, we expect fiscal policy will actually start dragging on growth. The U.S. has borrowed nearly $6 trillion since March 2020. Even the most ambitious versions of the spending bills currently winding their way through Congress would only maintain a fraction of that borrowing rate. Much of the new spending seems likely to be offset by tax increases and other sources of revenue, and it is allocated over a much longer time period, limiting its stimulative effect. And while other countries haven’t matched the U.S. in terms of fiscal stimulus, the global trend is clearly toward less, not more, stimulus in the years ahead.

Monetary policy is primed to make a directionally similar but far less dramatic move from “extremely accommodative” to merely “quite accommodative” after central banks helped stabilize financial markets and created the loosest financial conditions in modern economic history (Figure 3). The winding down of quantitative easing and an eventual – though not imminent – rise in global policy rates should help allay inflation fears, which already appear to be declining. Breakevens in the U.S. TIPS market, for instance, remain remarkably stable and below their spring peaks, while incoming inflation data shows a clear deceleration in the price increases that raised eyebrows in the second quarter.

Figure 3 — Global monetary policy can only really tighten from here, but it will do so slowly

The focus heading into 2022 may be on interest rate hikes and the return of pre-pandemic growth rates or something close to them. That environment could pose challenges to investors expecting the reflation trade to reignite and anything but U.S. large cap growth stocks to outperform. But if we do see another rotation into cyclicals, it will benefit areas of the market that have fallen to unusually inexpensive levels relative to the broader market: U.S. small cap stocks as well as emerging markets equities and credit.

This leads into one of our main portfolio themes for the fourth quarter: casting a wider net for income. After a wild ride over the first half of 2021, interest rate volatility has calmed down a bit. As the recovery moves forward, even at a slower pace, we still expect rates to move higher over the next six to twelve months. But the trajectory of the increase should be quite a bit flatter than it was in the first quarter, when the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield nearly doubled to 1.75%. Since then, it declined quickly from this level and has not come close to returning.

While we believe yields could increase back to that level before year end, we know that income-focused investors have long since given up on government bonds to produce adequate rates of return. Instead, it has made sense to turn to credit-sensitive parts of the fixed income market and municipal bonds, as well as dividend growth strategies within the equity market, and a robust portfolio of alternative assets that provide rents or other sources of income. While it’s natural to focus on changes in interest rates, we are more interested in what appears to be a lower equilibrium level for rates, both on cash and longer-duration bonds, making them less-useful strategic asset classes.

Of course, with both equity and credit markets already fully valued, looking outside of the public market sphere is increasingly necessary for us as investment managers. That’s why another of our themes this quarter is to take advantage of illiquid assets, which tend to have low correlations to those that trade publicly and often offer better risk-adjusted return profiles. In particular, we are focused on middle market private debt, a widening variety of direct real estate investments and agricultural investments in timberland and farmland. Investors should not expect the equity market gains of the last two years – or, indeed, the last 10 years – to continue given where valuations are today. We think the keys to achieving a desirable rate of return are 1) diversification and 2) a tolerance for illiquidity.

Risk 1: China’s economic policy uncertainty and our approach to emerging markets

Every quarter, it seems we face some sort of new idiosyncratic risk in the markets. Most recently, that role was filled by China and its more aggressive approach to regulatory policy, specifically in its treatment of companies within its technology, education and real estate sectors. Because of its size and importance to the global economy and to emerging markets (EM) in particular, China’s ad hoc policy announcements contributed to acute underperformance by EM assets, particularly in equities, given China’s prominence in that market.

Nuveen’s GIC discussed this issue in depth to prepare for this quarter, but came away with no strong tactical bias regarding China itself. We do, however, see strengthening tailwinds for EM as a whole. These include an improving macroeconomic situation, with vaccinations sharply on the rise and Delta finally fading, as well as favorable valuations and increasing demand for income drawing investors into higher yielding markets with lower valuations.

Even so, we remain cautious in our approach toward the single largest emerging market. China’s economic policy has been inexorably tied to the political machinations happening in the country, which are, in turn, affected by the country’s need to address its demographic challenges as the population ages rapidly in the coming years. China’s global ambitions in areas like technology and manufacturing give us continued reason to invest there, albeit selectively. Indeed, selectivity is one of our core investment themes in all markets this quarter, as political risks multiply and broad index-based strategies have less to offer.

Risk 2: We need an even bigger labor market comeback in the U.S.

It is impossible to study the global economy today without coming across supply and demand imbalances. While these have been well documented in areas of the manufacturing sector, the most concerning imbalance today is the apparent U.S. worker shortage. Or more precisely, a shortage of workers willing to take jobs at the wages being offered.

Wage growth is accelerating as the number of job openings continues to surge, creating close to an ideal environment for anyone actively looking for a job or considering returning to the labor force after an extended absence. The federal supplement for state unemployment insurance expired in early September, providing yet another impetus to return to work for the millions who were working in January 2020, but aren’t today.

We are optimistic that job creation will continue apace or even reaccelerate after the worst of the Delta variant has passed. But a permanent shrinkage in labor supply remains a key risk to our outlook. The U.S. and other large economies with aging populations need participation rates among prime age workers (25-54) to return to at least their pre-pandemic highs. If they don’t, we anticipate a growing risk that we’ll see a mix of higher inflation and lower profit margins for companies big and small.

Profit margins may already be under pressure starting in 2022 if the U.S. corporate tax rate increases are passed as part of the spending packages this fall. Adding surging input costs and higher wages to the equation – without a commensurate rise in worker productivity – presents a significant risk to equity markets.

Still a long way . . .

This is an area where leveraging environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors can help us identify opportunities and avoid unnecessary risks. Our survey of research on wages and equity performance suggests that stocks of companies that pay the highest wages do not, in a vacuum, outperform the market. However, firms that report higher rates of employee satisfaction – including pay considerations and a host of other factors like training, internal mobility and benefits – do tend to outperform their peers. This may be especially valuable for security selection in an environment of faster wage growth, and it’s why a key investment theme for the quarter is to focus on ESG factors that matter for performance.

Figure 4 – The best labor market for workers in recent memory

. . . to go before the end

As the world reaches the light at the end of the pandemic, the road back to normal may have a few bumps. Chief among them is the struggle of global supply to match extremely high levels of demand, something that has led to bursts of inflation but been consistent with record high company profits. As the delicate removal of policy stimulus helps cool things off, investors will have to look outside their comfort areas to find better income and return opportunities. But the experience of the third quarter told us that markets can remain resilient in the face of policy risks, and the opportunity cost of being on the sidelines may still be high.

Contact us
person image
Dimitrios N. Stathopoulos
Head of Americas Institutional Advisory Services
All market and economic data from Bloomberg, FactSet and Morningstar.

The views and opinions expressed are for informational and educational purposes only as of the date of production/writing and may change without notice at any time based on numerous factors, such as market or other conditions, legal and regulatory developments, additional risks and uncertainties and may not come to pass. This material may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature.

Such information may include, among other things, projections, forecasts, estimates of market returns, and proposed or expected portfolio composition. Any changes to assumptions that may have been made in preparing this material could have a material impact on the information presented herein by way of example. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk; principal loss is possible.

All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such. For term definitions and index descriptions, please access the glossary on nuveen.com. Please note, it is not possible to invest directly in an index.

A word on risk
All investments carry a certain degree of risk and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. Equity investing involves risk. Investments are also subject to political, currency and regulatory risks. These risks may be magnified in emerging markets. Diversification is a technique to help reduce risk. There is no guarantee that diversification will protect against a loss of income. Investing in municipal bonds involves risks such as interest rate risk, credit risk and market risk, including the possible loss of principal. The value of the portfolio will fluctuate based on the value of the underlying securities. There are special risks associated with investments in high yield bonds, hedging activities and the potential use of leverage. Portfolios that include lower rated municipal bonds, commonly referred to as “high yield” or “junk” bonds, which are considered to be speculative, the credit and investment risk is heightened for the portfolio. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A, and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC/CC/C and D are below-investment grade ratings. As an asset class, real assets are less developed, more illiquid, and less transparent compared to traditional asset classes. Investments will be subject to risks generally associated with the ownership of real estate-related assets and foreign investing, including changes in economic conditions, currency values, environmental risks, the cost of and ability to obtain insurance, and risks related to leasing of properties. Socially Responsible Investments are subject to Social Criteria Risk, namely the risk that because social criteria exclude securities of certain issuers for non-financial reasons, investors may forgo some market opportunities available to those that don’t use these criteria. Investors should be aware that alternative investments including private equity and private debt are speculative, subject to substantial risks including the risks associated with limited liquidity, the use of leverage, short sales and concentrated investments and may involve complex tax structures and investment strategies. Alternative investments may be illiquid, there may be no liquid secondary market or ready purchasers for such securities, they may not be required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information to investors, there may be delays in distributing tax information to investors, they are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as other types of pooled investment vehicles, and they may be subject to high fees and expenses, which will reduce profits. Alternative investments are not appropriate for all investors and should not constitute an entire investment program. Investors may lose all or substantially all of the capital invested. The historical returns achieved by alternative asset vehicles is not a prediction of future performance or a guarantee of future results, and there can be no assurance that comparable returns will be achieved by any strategy.

Nuveen provides investment advisory services through its investment specialists.
Back to Top