This site has been created for exclusive use by institutional investors only and does not take into account investment objectives, financial situation or specific needs of any individual investor. Information should not be the sole basis for any investment decision.
If you are not an institutional client, consultant or financial professional and are looking for more information about mutual funds and other products at Nuveen, please visit our site at www.nuveen.com.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. All investments involve some degree of risk including loss of principal. Investment objectives may not be met.
By agreeing you are confirming you are being truthful, acknowledging you have read the information above and accept the terms and conditions set out with this site and meeting the intended audience requirement for this site. Not all content on this site is appropriate or applicable for the general public and we cannot guarantee consequences with the use of this information by unauthorized or unintended users. Content on this site may not be redistributed and is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or provide a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.
A factors-first approach to efficiently growing assets in the surplus space
Corporate pension plans’ top priority: Building efficient portfolios in the surplus space
The median funded ratio of pension plans sponsored by S&P 500 companies was just 83% as of 30 Sep 2020.1 This highlights the need for corporate pensions to grow their assets efficiently while generating cash flows to deliver the promised benefits to plan participants — a dual mandate that is increasingly daunting in an environment of muted return expectations.
While some well-funded plans may be adequately positioned to deliver on their near-term liabilities, our analysis of typical portfolios used by well-funded, moderately funded and poorly funded corporate plans found that none of these cohorts are growing their assets efficiently in the surplus space.
Why are many corporate pension plans across funding levels building suboptimal portfolios? We believe this is because they have not embraced a factors-first approach to portfolio construction.
A factors-first approach centers on the idea that investors should focus on identifying which combination of risk factors the portfolio needs to own to optimize the growth of assets relative to the growth of liabilities. The portfolio’s asset allocation then becomes a byproduct of the targeted factor exposure.
Using the factors-first lens, we examine ways that corporate pension plans at various funding levels can optimize their approaches to portfolio construction. While most of our findings and recommendations focus on moderately funded plans (funding ratios between 80% and 90%) and the optimization techniques available to them, most of these approaches can be useful for plans at either end of the funding ratio spectrum, as well. We also address special considerations for well-funded and poorly funded plans.