0
Add funds
Fund 1
Fund 2
Fund 3
Fund 4
TOOLS
The Morningstar Fund Compare tool quickly evaluates different funds against one another. In addition to Nuveen funds, add any MF, CEF or ETF available from Morningstar. Important information and disclosures are included after you click Generate Report. Please ensure to enable pop-ups in your browser.
The Morningstar Portfolio Review tool compares and analyzes your portfolio holdings. In addition to Nuveen funds, add any MF, CEF or ETF available from Morningstar. Important information and disclosures are included after you click Generate Report. Please ensure to enable pop-ups in your browser.
Tools are currently unavailable for use on mobile. Please visit the desktop site.
fund compare tool image
Fund Compare
Quickly evaluate different MFs, CEFs and ETFs against one another
portfolio review tool image
Portfolio Review
Generate a detailed analysis of your portfolio holdings including MFs, CEFs and ETFs
plan profit calculator image
Plan Profit (k)alculator
A plan profitability analysis may reveal a more accurate business financial picture
Image of Municipal bond investing ladder tool
Municipal Bond Ladder Tool
Learn how a laddered portfolio may perform in rising rate environments
Powered by Morning star
Which type of investor are you?
Alternatives

Searching for yield – a role for junior capital

David McManama
Principal
Magnifying glass

The search for yield has always been a focal point of the fixed income investor, but today’s investors must look far and wide to find it. U.S. 10-year Treasuries have not seen the top side of 4.0% since the end of the global financial crisis and are currently priced to yield less than 2.0%. While the Federal Reserve has indicated that it may begin tapering its quantitative easing program later this year, it is our expectation that long-term U.S. Treasury yields will remain low by historical standards.

In this article, we consider the characteristics of private subordinated capital – commonly referred to as junior capital – which could help investors in their search for yield. As few investors are familiar with the specifics of junior capital, they can perhaps be best understood by discussing some of the similarities and differences with high yield (HY) bonds, which are often favored by investors in low-yielding markets.

High yield bonds

Unlike junior capital, HY bonds are well-known to most investors. They are publicly traded investments, covering a large opportunity set – in 2020, approximately $440 billion of HY bonds were issued1. They are non-investment grade, fixed-rate, public debt securities, offering higher return potential compared with investment grade debt, albeit with higher default risk. Historically, HY portfolios have returned between 6.0% and 7.0%2, which is a marked premium over other liquid fixed income alternatives. Two factors have mainly driven this performance: 1) the lower credit quality (and therefore higher yield) compared to investment grade debt, and 2) their usual subordination in the capital structure to other, more senior debt.

Junior capital

Junior capital also offers opportunities to enhance yield, but it differs from HY in a number of ways. It can take on multiple variations such as subordinated notes (fixed rate) and second lien term loans (floating rate), but they all share a few underlying characteristics: 1) subordination or junior in right of payment to a senior secured term loan as part of a capital structure used by a private equity firm in a leveraged buyout, 2) most commonly, return is all or mostly cash pay with a small paid-in-kind element and 3) average all-in pricing is between 10.0% and 12.0%.3

Risk-adjusted returns

Junior capital has the potential for higher returns than HY. Over the last ten years, average annual returns for junior capital have been almost double those of HY, at 11.0% and 6.4%, respectively.4 Returns were superior even when incorporating the global financial crisis into the analysis. Over the last 15 years, average annual returns for junior capital and HY were 11.0% and 7.3%, respectively.4 The difference is consistent, meaningful and can be explained by several factors:

  1. Size: HY bonds occupy a higher end of the market than junior capital – typically EBITDA of $50 million and above. Larger businesses are generally regarded as safer, more stable platforms, so a size discount is incorporated into HY returns. Junior capital often occupies the part of the market for borrowers under $50 million of EBITDA and is priced with more risk. However, we believe that risk can be mitigated with superior access to information, as we discuss in the next section.
  2. Liquidity: HY bond investors reap the benefits of investing in public securities, namely a high level of liquidity and the ability to be a short- or long-term investor. Junior capital investors are compensated for illiquidity with higher yield but must be committed to a longer-term investment strategy (typically three to five years of duration).
  3. Market dynamics: As public securities, HY bonds are traded and priced with a high degree of transparency. Information is available to all participants in the marketplace which establishes a price equilibrium among buyers and sellers of the notes. Alternatively, junior capital is issued in a private, imperfect marketplace with transactions between one buyer and one seller. While providers of junior capital financing must contend with the threat of competitive pressure from other lenders, pricing is determined more by negotiation than the dynamic pricing of public markets.
  4. Equity enhancement: In some cases, junior capital investors receive strips of common equity alongside their debt investments, which, if chosen carefully, can boost returns.
Comparing returns graph

The return spread between junior capital and HY becomes even more interesting when adjusted for risk. We can examine relative risk by using return volatility as a proxy. The table below shows the Sharpe ratio calculated for both HY and junior capital. The Sharpe ratio measures risk-adjusted return; essentially, the ratio of return over a period of time to volatility. A higher ratio implies greater risk-adjusted return. From March 31, 2006 to December 31, 2020, we calculated a junior capital Sharpe ratio of 2.50 vs. a HY Sharpe ratio of 0.55. The implication of Figure 2’s data is that junior capital offers higher relative returns per unit of risk.

returns chart

As discussed above, because HY bonds are fixed-rate securities trading in a public marketplace, these assets are subject to daily price movement. The most influential variable is credit spread volatility but other factors also contribute to price fluctuations, such as interest rate volatility. Junior capital’s exposure to these risk factors is very different. As it is an illiquid asset, junior capital is rarely traded. Its value is not subject to daily fluctuations of interest rates or of the supply-and-demand pressures of a public market. It is a buy-and-hold security, the value of which is determined almost entirely by the underlying credit quality of the borrower.

An information advantage

This brings us to the heart of the matter. Junior capital lenders enjoy one more key advantage: quality of information.

A properly staffed and resourced junior capital lending team can gain an edge through the quality and scope of the information they can access. By definition, publicly traded securities are required by regulation to make their financial information uniformly available to the public. On the other hand, junior capital lenders can benefit from direct access to borrowers in a private marketplace. And our experience suggests that this information advantage can perhaps be the critical edge that private lending teams can use to excel. Rather than relying solely on pre-prepared marketing documents, lenders complete a deep dive into borrower data, financials, key business model drivers and customer trends based on proprietary diligence requests. They receive one-on-one calls with management addressing diligence criteria, including detailed financial projections. Often, the lender is working alongside the private equity sponsor and can leverage the full scope of its buy-side diligence. This access to information typically allows for more informed decision making. And it does not stop with underwriting. Junior capital lenders remain in the data flow throughout the duration of the investment, with frequent calls with management or even board observation rights. Furthermore, junior capital lenders almost always receive financial covenants on their investments. Typically, these are in the form of a leverage covenant. These guardrails on company performance provide lenders with leverage against borrowers if financials turn soft.

Junior capital offers higher relative returns per unit of risk, according to our analysis

Conclusion

Fixed income investors who are comfortable with illiquid securities and a medium-term investment horizon should consider junior capital. Our analysis shows that, historically, junior capital has offered a premium to reflect these risk exposures, rewarding investors able and willing to exploit the asset class’ structural market and information advantages. A well-constructed portfolio can generate significant annual returns with minimal losses.

Choosing the right partner is important – the junior capital market is large with many participants, and despite its overall stability, pitfalls await the undiscerning lender. Constructing a portfolio is an active process that requires product and market expertise, as well as strong and tenured relationships with borrowers. A quality manager should have a track record that is extensive, durable and accessible. However, with the right manager, junior capital can play a very important role in the search for yield.

What to look for in a junior capital manager:

Related articles
Alternatives 2021 predictions for private markets
One of the many lessons of 2020 was that the world of COVID-19 inhabited a parallel but different universe than the global markets.
Alternatives The big bounce back
As featured in PDI, Randy Schwimmer, Co-Head of Senior Lending, Churchill discusses the bright future of U.S. middle-market direct lending.
Alternatives Today’s opportunity in the U.S. direct lending space
After years of investor skepticism over the “crowded” direct lending space, we believe now is an opportune time for investors to consider putting money to work in this market.

Endnotes

1 Source: S&P Global Leveraged Commentary & Data

2 Source: ICE BofA US High Yield Index Total Return Index as of December 31, 2020

3 Source: Churchill portfolio, 2013 to present

4 Source: ICE BofA US High Yield Index Total Return Index and Refinitiv Eikon – Cambridge Associates Database of Private Subordinated Capital Funds as of December 31, 2020

Investments in middle market loans are subject to certain risks. Please consider all risks carefully prior to investing in any particular strategy.

These investments are subject to credit risk and potentially limited liquidity, as well as interest rate risk, currency risk, prepayment and extension risk, inflation risk, and risk of capital loss.

The views and opinions expressed are for informational and educational purposes only as of the date of production / writing and may change without notice at any time based on numerous factors, such as market or other conditions, legal and regulatory developments, additional risks and uncertainties and may not come to pass. This material may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature.

Churchill Asset Management is a registered investment advisor and an affiliate of Nuveen, LLC. “Churchill Senior Lending” refers to the senior secured loan investment team and portfolio of Churchill Asset Management.

This material is not intended to be a recommendation or investment advice, does not constitute a solicitation to buy, sell or hold a security or an investment strategy, and is not provided in a fiduciary capacity. The information provided does not take into account the specific objectives or circumstances of any particular investor, or suggest any specific course of action. Financial professionals should independently evaluate the risks associated with products or services and exercise independent judgment with respect to their clients.

A word on risk

As an asset class, agricultural investments are less developed, more illiquid, and less transparent compared to traditional asset classes. Agricultural investments will be subject to risks generally associated with the ownership of real estate-related assets, including changes in economic conditions, environmental risks, the cost of and ability to obtain insurance, and risks related to leasing of properties.

Nuveen provides investment advisory solutions through its investment specialists.

You are about to access our website for visitors outside of the United States.

You are about to access our website for Nuveen Global Cities REIT

You are leaving the Nuveen website.

You are leaving the Nuveen website and going to the website of the MI 529 Advisor Plan, distributed by Nuveen Securities, LLC.

The Nuveen website for institutional investors is available for you.

You are about to access our website for visitors outside of the United States.

Contact us
Contact us
Back to Top